Quote: Originally Posted by ErinB
The bill that passed here eliminates all benefits for all unmarried couples in addition to defining marriage between one man and one woman.
So, technically, I should not have been covered under my husband's insurance before we were married because the state refutes domestic partnership.
I know that everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. My advice is to be sure that you are an informed and responsible voter before you head to the polls. That is so ironic. The company I used to work for allowed me to cover my FI as a household member and pay extra for his coverage, but the company I had to apply with when I was outsourced, would only cover a household member in a gay relationship. Their theory was if you are capable of getting married but choose not to, they would not cover a non-spouse.